On Thursday, 26th January 2006, Robert Watson wrote: >On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Olivier Houchard wrote: > >> Robert Watson and myself have been working on a pts implementation, ala >> SysV/linux, for quite some time... This is a long overdue feature, so well done! However there's something that looks a bit odd to me, and since I don't have -current set up at the moment, I can't check directly, so I'll ask here: Is it true that the naming scheme uses /dev/pts/999 and /dev/pty999, not /dev/pty/999? If so, that looks like a mistake. Is there something stopping the cleaner naming being used? If I've just read the code wrong, then I apologise and will immediately clear bench space for a -current test box! Stephen.Received on Sat Jan 28 2006 - 11:31:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:51 UTC