In message: <20060131195637.U95776_at_fledge.watson.org> Robert Watson <rwatson_at_FreeBSD.org> writes: : : On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : > Given how intertwingled picobsd is to the underly OS, I think you are going : > to have a hard time getting to #3. #2 is fine with me. : : My feelings here are pretty much the same -- I'm skeptical about the continued : ability to maintain PicoBSD outside CVS in a long-term way, given tight : integration with the source tree. People can and do maintain there own : versions of FreeBSD releases and wrappers (FreeSBIE is presumably the most : successful example), but it's a lot of work, and if there's trouble finding : enough hands for the current PicoBSD, it doesn't seem likely it will get more : hands somewhere else. Our company maintains its own release tools that would fall somewhere between PicoBSD and NanoBSD. We've tried very hard to make them version independent, but it is a constant struggle. WarnerReceived on Tue Jan 31 2006 - 19:05:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:51 UTC