On Friday 07 July 2006 15:55, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > середа 05 липень 2006 12:18, Robert Watson написав: > > Perhaps the world has changed since that time, but those sound like > > pretty good reasons to me. So these are my recollections, but since I'm > > not an expert in our toolchain bits, I could be off in the woods somewhere. > > Can we, perhaps start small and make the libiberty piece centrally available > (and of the most recent version)? > > There is even a port of (devel/gnulibiberty), which its maintainer (CC-ed), > I'm sure, will be glad to see obsoleted... > > We are currently building it four times: > > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/libiberty.a > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/libiberty.a > /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/libiberty.a > /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/libiberty.a > > And installing none... > > Halving that, and installing the result to be usable by ports would be a > decent improvement, would not it? Only if it doesn't suffer from all the same problems as libbfd.a. -- John BaldwinReceived on Fri Jul 07 2006 - 19:11:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:58 UTC