On Saturday 08 July 2006 02:12, Joerg Wunsch wrote: > As John Baldwin wrote: > > > > Halving that, and installing the result to be usable by ports > > > would be a decent improvement, would not it? > > > Only if it doesn't suffer from all the same problems as libbfd.a. > > What problems, btw.? Only curious. All the different projects that use libbfd tend to include their own private version which aren't all compatible with each other (binutils has its own copy, gdb has another, etc.) -- John BaldwinReceived on Mon Jul 10 2006 - 15:03:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:58 UTC