On Tuesday 11 July 2006 11:30, Brooks Davis wrote: > My life would be a heck of a lot simpler if LDAP support were included > in the base. At the moment I'm using NIS in several situations where > it just doesn't cut it any more. IMO we need (as a minimum) a modern > network directory service client in the base. While a majority of > FreeBSD users may not need LDAP in the base, I would suspect that a > majority of machines would benefit from it. A much greater portion of > machines would probably benefit from and LDAP client then benefit from a > number of the servers in the base system such as BIND (not a criticism > of having BIND in the base). I don't see why building it from ports is difficult.. That's what I do. Your argument applies to a few hundred other ports :) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:58 UTC