Re: nss_ldap and openldap importing

From: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor_at_gsoft.com.au>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:52:56 +0930
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 11:30, Brooks Davis wrote:
> My life would be a heck of a lot simpler if LDAP support were included
> in the base.  At the moment I'm using NIS in several situations where
> it just doesn't cut it any more.  IMO we need (as a minimum) a modern
> network directory service client in the base.  While a majority of
> FreeBSD users may not need LDAP in the base, I would suspect that a
> majority of machines would benefit from it.  A much greater portion of
> machines would probably benefit from and LDAP client then benefit from a
> number of the servers in the base system such as BIND (not a criticism
> of having BIND in the base).

I don't see why building it from ports is difficult.. That's what I do.

Your argument applies to a few hundred other ports :)

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C

Received on Tue Jul 11 2006 - 00:23:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:58 UTC