Re: vmstat's entries type

From: Oliver Fromme <olli_at_lurza.secnetix.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:25:59 +0200 (CEST)
Robert Watson wrote:
 > Oliver Fromme wrote:
 > 
 > > > and easily triples the amount of storage for each of them...
 > > 
 > > True, storage is tripled.  But how many counters are we talking about here? 
 > > I guess rather a few, not thousands of them, right?
 > > 
 > > > It is ugly :-(
 > > 
 > > Yes, I certainly agree, it's ugly.  But having wrong output from "vmstat -s" 
 > > and other tools is ugly, too -- and it is noticed by a lot more people.
 > 
 > This problem is not limited to vmstat -- the network stack uses 32-bit 
 > counters in a lot of places where 32-bits has become very small.

I see.  That's unfortunate.  :-(

However, byte counters and packet counters in IPFW and IPF
(and probably PF, but I haven't verified) are already 64bit.
So there _are_ at least a few places where the problem does
not exist.

# ipfw show
65535 26326861627 25395554002225 allow ip from any to any
# uname -m
i386

Best regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme,  secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing
Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author
and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way.

"[...]  one observation we can make here is that Python makes
an excellent pseudocoding language, with the wonderful attribute
that it can actually be executed."  --  Bruce Eckel
Received on Thu Jul 20 2006 - 16:26:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:58 UTC