Re: Are there any beakage of linuxulator (on amd64)?

On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 01:57:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 27 July 2006 09:13, Divacky Roman wrote:
> > > > this thursday at work I'll try to provide some more info, what exaclty 
> do you
> > > > need? is what -DDEBUG prints enough?
> > > 
> > > Probably.  The changes in question were just in the linux semctl function, 
> so you
> > > really only need printf's for that function to figure out which case it is 
> blowing
> > > up one and why.
> > 
> > soooo....
> > 
> > I checked the coredump and found this:
> > 
> > 1) its not acroread what coredumps but bash binary (the binary used for the
> > script)
> > when I manually tried running the bash and "exec /bin/ls" etc. it worked
> > I havent investigated further waht causes the coredump
> > 
> > 2) I put printf() at the very begining of the linux_semctl() function and
> > ran the acroread binary. The printf was not printed (ie. it didnt used the
> > linxu_semctl function)
> 
> That's odd, because the person who did the binary test claimed it was just the 
> change to this file that caused the breakage.  That is, if they reverted 
> linux_ipc.c to the revision before the kern_semctl() changes it worked fine.  
> Can you test that to see if that's true for you?  (You'll have to revert last 
> revision of linux_util.h as well.)

pls, can you provide me patch which contains all the changes?

thnx