Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:30:07PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > >>Should its kernel backend not support all of those options as well? Or >>perhaps global_opts in vfs_mount.c should be updated to support all > > > Can you try this patch? I'm not sure if "force" and "sync" > should be global_opts or not because I don't know They are no more global than the ACL or multilabel options, not to mentiont he NFS-specific options. > if they make sense for every FS, but for symmetry with what was > in mount_msdosfs before, we can push them into the filesystem code for msdosfs. > These inconsistencies between the various mount programs and > the various filesystem code is why I've been trying to push > towards using a single mount binary, and pushing the mount option > parsing into vfs_mount.c and the code for the specific filesystem. > We are not quite there yet, but we are a lot closer. > Thanks for doing the un-fun job of unwinding all of this. ScottReceived on Thu Jun 01 2006 - 03:29:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:56 UTC