On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:03:16AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > ... > >> I think if you don't have any swap configured, a swap-backed md > >> will be no worse off than a memory-backed one would. I'd be rather strongly incline dto agree with that, FWIW. > > Yeah, it's kind of a poorly chosen name. > > Should we still revert the default from using -M for tmpmfs="YES" and > varmfs="YES" in rc.conf? Ever since /usr/src/etc/rc.d/tmp rev. 1.35 (creation of $tmpmfs_flags), I have used the specification to avoid -M. I'd recommend that the default ought not be -M. Since Kris posed his query re: -o async, I changed my $tmpmfs_flags to include it -- both for 6-STABLE and for -CURRENT -- on my laptop, where I track each of those branches every day that there's a change to the corresponding source tree. (Well, save for last weekend, when I was off-Net for a couple of days....) While I haven't seen a noticable performance improvement from -o async, I've certainly not seen any negative impact at all. FWIW, the one other tweak to $tmpmfs_flags I find useful is to adjust the inode density to reflect a larger number of (smaller) files in the /tmp file system. On the laptop, where the daily buildworlds (and occasional builds of mozilla...) tend to be the most strenuous workout it gets, -i4096 seems to be OK. For CVS servers (which the laptop can be at times, though I prefer to use more dedicated resource to that sort of task), I find -i1024 to be preferable. (Recall the behavior of a CVS server when as "cvs update" is requested involves building an isomorphic directory hierarchy in /tmp. I was pleased to see that a CVS server I had set up had no problems doing 9 simultaneous "cvs update" runs against /usr/ports. Absent the -i1024 setting, that would likely have been less-than-satisfactory.) Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david_at_catwhisker.org Doing business with spammers only encourages them. Please boycott spammers. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:56 UTC