Re: indefinite wait buffer take-II

From: Arno J. Klaassen <arno_at_heho.snv.jussieu.fr> Date: 04 Jun 2006 23:29:25 +0200 · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:56 UTC

grr, followup to myself .. 

the part 

  if ( retry+TIMO_CHUNK > timo_secs) {
     timo_secs = retry+TIMO_CHUNK;
  }

should be read as :

  if ( retry*TIMO_CHUNK > timo_secs) {
     timo_secs = retry*TIMO_CHUNK;
  }

(I tested it this way, initialising timo_secs=1; sorry)

-- 

  Arno J. Klaassen

  SCITO S.A.
  8 rue des Haies
  F-75020 Paris, France
  http://scito.com