In message <20060612075515.C26634_at_fledge.watson.org>, Robert Watson writes: >What we probably want is an sx_init_interlock() that allows us to provide the >interlock for an sx lock, wich some variations on sx_*lock() to say we already >hold the interlock. Sounds overly complicated to use. Why not just a sx_xlockfast() sx_xunlockfast() ? for some value of "fast" ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Mon Jun 12 2006 - 05:01:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:57 UTC