On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 09:53:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 19 April 2006 18:14, Park Foreman wrote: > > System: Nokia IP330 using AMD K6 processor > > Card: Zynx ZX412 dual 10/100 card and DEC/Intel 21143 chipset > > > > ifconfig: > > dc0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > options=8<VLAN_MTU> > > inet 172.21.1.1 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 172.21.255.255 > > inet6 fe80::2c0:95ff:fee5:7d8c%dc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 > > ether 00:c0:95:e5:12:ab > > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > > status: no carrier > > dc1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > options=8<VLAN_MTU> > > inet 172.21.2.1 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 172.21.255.255 > > inet6 fe80::2c0:95ff:fee5:7d8d%dc1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 > > ether 00:c0:95:e5:23:cd > > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > > status: no carrier Aside: those two IP addresses are on the same IP subnet, 172.21.0.0/16. Does that now work? It didn't used to, but I once saw a project on the wishlist to separate out the ARP table from the forwarding table so that this could work. Did that happen? With the above configuration, both NICs would have to be plugged into the same LAN, of course. Or maybe the OP meant to set /24 netmasks, but didn't. Regards, Brian.Received on Wed Jun 14 2006 - 05:36:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:57 UTC