Re: HEADS-UP: removed COMPAT_43 from GENERIC (and other configs)

In message <200606151259.57929.beech_at_alaskaparadise.com>, Beech Rintoul writes:
>--nextPart6195424.2x6DgSG1L7
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>  charset="iso-8859-15"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>On Thursday 15 June 2006 12:36, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <4491C2F0.6000007_at_rogers.com>, Mike Jakubik writes:
>> >What about COMPAT_43TTY? Is this still needed, how exactly does it
>> >affect the system?
>>
>> It adds a bunch of ancient-compatible ioctls to the kernel.
>>
>> It is, as a principle, not needed, but thanks to the many variants
>> of "sh configure" employed in usr/ports, a quite large number of
>> ports go "Ohh, this is BSD, I'd better use the old ioctls" and
>> break if you don't offer them.
>
>Is there a way to easily identify these ports? I've had both lines commente=
>d=20
>out of my kernel configs for some time and haven't seen any port breakage o=
>n=20
>either 6.x or -current.

I think the trick is to remove those from your kernel and remove the
<sgtty.h> #include file and then build all the ports :-(


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.