Re: /bin/sh doesn't run autoconf'ied configure scripts correctly

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 11:06:08 +0100

Ade Lovett <ade_at_FreeBSD.org> writes:
> Of course, the next step, now that the pain of the single libtool is
> mostly behind us (devel/gnu-libtool is slated for demolition fairly
> soon)

Huh?  Why?  What will developers working on software that uses libtool
use?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no

Received on Wed Mar 01 2006 - 09:06:17 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Derek Ragona: "Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive"
Previous message: Dmitry Pryanishnikov: "Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive"
In reply to: Ade Lovett: "Re: /bin/sh doesn't run autoconf'ied configure scripts correctly"
Next in thread: Ade Lovett: "Re: /bin/sh doesn't run autoconf'ied configure scripts correctly"
Reply: Ade Lovett: "Re: /bin/sh doesn't run autoconf'ied configure scripts correctly"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:52 UTC