SANETO Takanori wrote: > I don't think this is serious problem, but it's annoying. > > When I put 'k' in /etc/malloc.conf, some commands (cvsup and > vmware-checkvm) show warning about unknown character. These commands > seem to have phkmalloc implementation linked statically. > > On the other hand, when I put '>' in /etc/malloc.conf, many commands > will show warnings. > > For second case, isn't it reasonable for jemalloc to just ignore > phkmalloc specific characters? > For first case, how about introducing new option source (i.e. > /etc/jemalloc.conf, JEMALLOC_OPTIONS or something like that)? > > What do you think? This is a sticky issue. I'd rather leave things as they are, partly because I expect the "fix" would actually be quite messy. I view malloc options as pretty much exclusively a devel/debug aid, rather than a stable API. In order to truly fix this API, I think we'd have to go further than what you suggest. The _malloc_options global variable is harder to deal with than MALLOC_OPTIONS or /etc/malloc.conf when trying to design a fix. The problem for _malloc_options is that we can't reliably use a function-based API, since malloc may be called before the application has a chance to configure the allocator. As such, there is no direct way for an app to respond to malloc option incompatibilities. It would be possible to construct a more complex interface for malloc configuration that would mostly solve these issues, but I don't think it's worth the added complexity for a devel/debug facility. JasonReceived on Mon Mar 13 2006 - 19:53:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:53 UTC