Re: patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
> Daichi GOTO wrote:
>> All folks have interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions
>> and ask "how about merge?" at every turn :)
> 
> OK.  How about a merge?
> 
> I'd really like to see this in 6-STABLE.

Me too, but unfortunately it is difficult with some reasons
(detail information http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/).
Of course, our patch gives the conditions for integration of
-current OK. For -stable is BAD.

We must keep the API compatibility of command/library
for integration of -stable. With some technical/specifical
reasons, our improved unionfs has a little uncompatibility.

For the last time, integration of -stable will be left
to the judgment of src committers and others.

> Regards,
> 
> Jan Mikkelsen.

-- 
   Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi