On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 09:43:04AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Divacky Roman <xdivac02_at_stud.fit.vutbr.cz> wrote: > > >>Does anyone know the linux syscall numbers on alpha/amd64 for lstat? > >>They need to be added to the corresponding syscalls.master. > > > >in my patch I had lstat as syscall 84, you changed that to stat. I > >had reports > >it worked on amd64.. why did you change it? > > I don't know how it happened, but somehow my tree got messed up. I did not > use an editor to change anything before my first commit. It's strange. > > Can you please "cvs update" the files, resolve the conflicts (should be > "just > removing some strange lines and keeping the right lines") and send me the > patch per email to Alexander_at_Leidinger.net? unfortunately I've already done this using the version you commited as the correct one :( but the fix should be just sed -e 's/linux_stat/linux_lstat' if I looked at it correctly but I dont have much time today (exam at school) so pls recheck this > If you don't have time to do it until the evening (let's say in the next 8 > hours), I will try to fix "my mess" myself when I'm back home. pls do so...Received on Mon Mar 20 2006 - 13:22:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:53 UTC