Re: aha(4) doesn't depend on cam(4).

M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20060324014047.95ffc1e3.nork_at_FreeBSD.org>
>             Norikatsu Shigemura <nork_at_freebsd.org> writes:
> : Hi aha(4) maintainers!
> : 
> : 	I have a patch for aha(4).
> 
> Actually, I'm the aha maintainer.
> 
> Why is this needed?  Is it because aha references symbols that would
> otherwise be undefined?
> 
> Warner
> 

I think what he wants is to have cam.ko load when aha.ko is loaded (I'm
taking a leap here in that I haven't checked to see if aha.ko exists).
It's a harmless patch anyways, not sure why there needs to be an
argument about it.

Scott