workaround i use: 32-bit jail on amd64 system ... not so bad ... 2006/5/2, Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde_at_aldan.algebra.com>: > > On Tuesday 02 May 2006 05:59, Peter Jeremy wrote: > = But probably not as fast since it's using a generic 'C' core instead > = of a hand-tweaked assembler core. I read Mikhail's comment as meaning > = that it is possible to build non-trivial 32-bit executables on amd64, > = there's just work still needed to make this work as a general case. > > Thanks, Peter. You are correct, that was my meaning. > > Interestingly, the assembler-optimized 32-bit routines made lame slower > than > the native 64-bit code in my experiments (one may wish to compare > assembler > vs. C lame on i386 too). But it all *worked*, which was the point... > > -mi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >Received on Tue May 02 2006 - 13:15:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:55 UTC