Scott Long wrote: > Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> On Tue, 2006-May-09 16:03:12 +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >> >>> Using a USB pendrive can lead to kernel panic because of the issue >>> mentioned in the subject. >> >> >> >> See kern/78179. Mark Tinguely and I have spent a far amount of time >> fighting it. We have made some improvement - bus_dmamem_alloc() >> correctly supports BUS_DMA_NOWAIT so you get a runtime error instead >> of a panic. At this stage, the umass device needs to be re-written so >> that it doesn't issue large contiguous mallocs at interrupt level. >> The way forward would seem to be to make the USB subsystem support >> scatter-gather (skeleton code already exists) to avoid the need for >> contigmalloc(). > > > Yes, this is the correct solution. Unfortunately, it looks to require a > significant amount of code for UHCI controllers. But then, the whole > point of UHCI is to have the OS do all the work anyways =-/ > > I need to look at your PR some, but I'm not sure that I want to > encourage bad practices with bus_dmamem_alloc and contigmalloc. I > know that this doesn't help you solve the problem. A possible > workaround might be to pre-allocate a pool of buffers and tell CAM > to limit the number of outstanding transactions to that number of > buffers. You could also just set the max transfer size to PAGE_SIZE > and let the block layer split the i/o's up for you. Page sized > allocations use malloc instead of contigmalloc (though there are > problems with this when dealing with restrictive dma tags, don't get > me started on how half-assed some of the busdma implementation still > is). Pre-allocating a pool is what I would do. > One thing I forgot to mention about this is that I still firmly believe that the umass SIM should be a per-USB bus entity, not a per-USB device entity. I.e. when you load umass.ko, it should create a SIM for every USB bus. Then when umass devices are plugged in, they should just attach as periph devices on the appropriate SIM. The current practice of treating a umass device as a per-instance SIM definitely complicates memory handling like this. ScottReceived on Tue May 09 2006 - 17:43:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:55 UTC