Re: HEADS UP: socket and pcb reference changes entering tree today

From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim_at_macomnet.ru>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 22:03:14 +0400 (MSD)
On Sun, 21 May 2006, 18:55+0100, Robert Watson wrote:

>
> On Mon, 15 May 2006, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> > There is a bug in raw ip code processing which panics system.  I
> > put a small regression test in
> > src/tools/regression/netinet/rawconnect.
> >
> > At the moment the code path for the connected raw ip socket looks
> > like that:
> >
> > % soclose()
> > %   sodisconnect()
> > %     rip_disconnect()
> > %       rip_abort()
> > %         rip_pcbdetach()
> > %   rip_detach <<<--------- panic
> > %     rip_pcbdetach()
> >
> > .. and we panics in rip_detach() at KASSERT(inp != NULL).
> >
> > With this patch panic has gone.
>
> This looks good in terms of pcb structure, but you should acquire
> SOCK_LOCK around the so_state manipulation.  To prevent races, I
> suggest doing it while also holding the INP lock in the center of
> the locking sets from the inpcb. There are some other remaining bugs
> in the raw socket code elsewhere also, I think.

I "copied" this code from udp_usrreq.c::udp_disconnect().  There is no
such lock.  Is it a bug too?

-- 
Maxim Konovalov
Received on Sun May 21 2006 - 16:03:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:56 UTC