On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:30:13PM +0200, mlfbsd wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:30:37PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > On 2006-05-22 16:14, Brooks Davis <brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net> wrote: > > >On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:12:24PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >> I noticed that with tmpmfs in rc.conf, the md is not being mounted > > >> with -o async; this is an enormous performance boost, so is there a > > >> reason it is not used, or just that it was overlooked? > > > > > > Just overlooked as far as I know. We correctly switched to not mounting > > > with softupdates, but should probably switch to -o async. > > > > Right. The only reasons why the current tmpmfs_flags doesn't > > include the `-o async' option too are: > > > > a) It didn't back when it was all hardcoded in the script > > > > b) I didn't think about adding it by default when revision > > 1.230 of src/etc/defaults/rc.conf was committed by me > > > > If it does improve things, we should probably make the change :) > > > > The sys/dev/md/md.c rev 1.115 commit log says async used to be the default, > but was switched off because it was causing deadlocks. Did this get fixed > since ? You are confusing mdconfig's -o async mode, used only for vnode backing (not the case here anyway): [no]async For vnode backed devices: avoid IO_SYNC for increased performance but at the risk of deadlocking the entire kernel. with mount's -o async mode, used at the filesystem layer on any device. The latter does not have deadlocks. Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:56 UTC