Embedded file system

From: Olivier Gautherot <ogautherot_at_vtr.net>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 23:24:50 -0400
Hi folks!

First of all, sorry for cross-posting but I think it may be of interest to 
both groups: small_at_ as the ultimate target and current_at_ for their experience.

After todays discussion, I've tried to summarize the comments to come up with 
some requirements - I've put up some more titles for additional items but, in 
the short term, I would like to ensure that the direction is correct and, 
hopefully, define it better yet. The idea is to define what the technology 
can or can't do before we organize the FS. I mean to help design a FS for a 
known target and not design for fun and, only then, look desperately for an 
application ;-)

V 0.0 of the draft is at: http://mlagy.free.fr/POFS.pdf . This doc is really 
meant as a base for discussion, nothing else yet. Poul-Henning, you're 
welcome to raise a big binary red flag (i.e. ***NO*** :-) ) if you see 
something wrong ;-) When we come to a consensus, I can load it up on 
the "idea" page.

Happy reading
-- 
Olivier Gautherot
olivier_at_gautherot.net
Received on Fri May 26 2006 - 01:26:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:56 UTC