Re: FreeBSD's embedded agenda

From: Ben Kelly <bkelly_at_vadev.org>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 00:04:46 -0400

Jim Thompson wrote:
> The real issue with porting JFFS2 is that its covered by the GPL, and 
> putting GPL code in the FreeBSD kernel is typically considered a 'no-no'.

Couldn't this be handled in the same way as the ext2 and reiserfs file 
systems?

> Jim

Thanks.

- Ben

Received on Fri May 26 2006 - 02:04:49 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jim Thompson: "Re: FreeBSD's embedded agenda"
Previous message: Ed Maste: "Re: panic: mutex vm object not owned at src/sys/vm/vm_object.c:695"
In reply to: Jim Thompson: "Re: FreeBSD's embedded agenda"
Next in thread: Peter Jeremy: "Re: FreeBSD's embedded agenda"
Reply: Peter Jeremy: "Re: FreeBSD's embedded agenda"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:56 UTC