On 5/28/06, Mike Silbersack <silby_at_silby.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 27 May 2006, Ben Kaduk wrote: > > > Thanks for putting in the work on this. I will hopefully be able to > > test sometime this week, but the machine in question is currently > > under heavy use so I make no guarantees. > > > > I will try not to complain too loudly if I am unable to test now and > > updating later breaks things. > > > > -Ben Kaduk > > If it's a busy system, then don't test yet. This is just a diagnostic > test to see what may be going wrong, so it'll be better to wait until I > have a patch that I actually think fixes the problem before testing. :) > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack > It is busy in that I am generating some data on it for my research group (but I am the only user); however, my sundays are my own, so I was able to apply the patch (by hand; patch(1) didn't like it) and recompile. I have two (verbose) dmesgs that are available, should be https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/kaduk/www/current/dmesg.bfe.128 and https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/kaduk/www/current/dmesg.bfe.511 respectively; hopefully they will help I am currently running the 511 kernel; the 128 didn't find an IP via dhcp. Thanks for investigating this, Ben KadukReceived on Sun May 28 2006 - 16:29:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:56 UTC