On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:09:48AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: >> >> I agree with the last part, but I think we need to bump sooner rather >> than later because we need to support binary only applications compiled >> against 6.x (remember, we're not really supporting anything else so >> smart vendors are going to build against it). >> > Hmm, bumping not versioned libraries *now* and not bumping them > again at pre-release would work, but doing it without also bumping > "to be versioned" libraries is IMO pointless. And if we bump all > of them now, we'll have to bump some of them again when versioning > is turned on by default. Actually, remember that this is -current so we only need to bump them once. Symbol versioning could be turned on later, but... > I think more important would be to know > the plans regarding the symbol versioning in 7.0-RELEASE; if the > plan is to have them versioned, then I think we should sync shlib > majors bumping with this change. I agree that we should do this at the same time. -- DEReceived on Thu Nov 02 2006 - 17:39:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:02 UTC