Mike Tancsa <mike_at_sentex.net> suggested i try ifconfig fxp0 media 10baseT/UTP ifconfig fxp0 media autoselect this worked! i will next reboot with in_fxp.c reverted to pre 2006.10.06. but first i did the suggested analysis, which follows. > (1) When it's "dead", do interrupts still fire for the interface when packets > go near by? See vmstat -i. nope > (2) Does the driver think the link is still negotiated? What are the > interface flags set to? See ifconfig. same as in first post on this whine # ifconfig fxp0 fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 options=8<VLAN_MTU> inet 147.28.0.39 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 147.28.0.255 inet 147.28.0.40 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 147.28.0.40 ether 00:30:48:51:c8:5e media: Ethernet 100baseTX <full-duplex> status: active > (3) When you run tcpdump on the interace, does it see packets from the > outside world? nope. only this interface issuing arp requests etc. > (4) If you ping out the interface, does tcpdump see packets? Do you get > ENOBUFS? Have ping send at least 256 packets. Do you get errors? Send > to the broadcast address so that arp doesn't need to be working to > transmit. fun one as, when it is in this state, i have only serial access through the craft port. this machine is 4000km away in a rack. so i nohupped and backgrounded the pinger, and watched tcpdump. nohup.out showed zero response ping: sendto: Host is down ping: sendto: Host is down ping: sendto: Host is down PING 147.28.0.35 (147.28.0.35): 56 data bytes --- 147.28.0.35 ping statistics --- 325 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss tcpdump showed only the arp requests 23:32:41.459630 arp who-has 147.28.0.35 tell 147.28.0.39 23:32:42.460575 arp who-has 147.28.0.35 tell 147.28.0.39 23:32:43.461486 arp who-has 147.28.0.35 tell 147.28.0.39 23:32:44.462426 arp who-has 147.28.0.35 tell 147.28.0.39 23:32:45.463347 arp who-has 147.28.0.35 tell 147.28.0.39 23:32:46.464279 arp who-has 147.28.0.35 tell 147.28.0.39 > (5) What does netstat -m show? # netstat -m 132/693/825 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 128/262/390/17088 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 128/256 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) 0/28/28/0 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/0 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/0 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 289K/809K/1098K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) 0/22/4528 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 30 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 0 calls to protocol drain routines > (6) Any unusual dmesg output? In particular, any mention of fxp state > changes or watchdogs firing? nope # dmesg | grep fxp fxp0: <Intel 82559 Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0x9800-0x983f mem 0xe2203000-0xe2203fff,0xe2100000-0xe21fffff irq 5 at device 6.0 on pci2 miibus0: <MII bus> on fxp0 fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:51:c8:5e fxp1: <Intel 82559 Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0x9c00-0x9c3f mem 0xe2201000-0xe2201fff,0xe2000000-0xe20fffff irq 12 at device 7.0 on pci2 miibus1: <MII bus> on fxp1 fxp1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:51:c8:5f fxp0: link state changed to UP fxp0: promiscuous mode enabled fxp0: promiscuous mode disabled > (7) Does lowering the interface, waiting ten seconds, then raising it > help? nope > Notice that these are all much easier if you have a serial console. well, most of them are :). > If not, you might want to do the above using cron and a temporary file > followed by a reboot. :-) i hope to do better than that :) randyReceived on Tue Nov 14 2006 - 22:43:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:02 UTC