Danny Braniss wrote: > [...] >> Yeah, we have a new patchset to solve above problem I think. > > any chance that the new unionfs will make it to 6.2? We cannot merger unionfs patch to 6.x branch. It'll just only for -current. For 6.x patchset is just a patchset. > I'm using it, and it's working just fine - as opposed to the unusable > one supplied. For under some heavy situation with mount_nullfs, it has a problem since the lock mechanism. To solve that problem, we need a new API(function) for VFS. We are discussing about it and need vfs-hackers help. Sorry for my slow response :( > If not, Daichi GOTO, will you have a new set of patches? > union_vfsops.c just changed, for example. > thanks, > danny uhmm... you need a new patchset if it is under construction? -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichiReceived on Tue Oct 10 2006 - 08:25:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:01 UTC