[This is still being sent to too many mailing lists since I don't know which ones it should go to except gnats.] On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, John Baldwin wrote: >> Including sys/types.h would add lots of namespace pollution which >> sys/ipc.h and sys/sem.h are trying hard to avoid. sem.h is trying too >> hard -- POSIX requires it to declare time_t (and pid_t, key_t and size_t, >> which it already declares). > > Is this better? > > Index: sem.h > =================================================================== > RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/sys/sem.h,v > retrieving revision 1.29 > diff -c -r1.29 sem.h > *** sem.h 17 Nov 2004 13:12:06 -0000 1.29 > --- sem.h 16 Oct 2006 18:30:05 -0000 > *************** > *** 111,116 **** > --- 111,121 ---- > #define _SIZE_T_DECLARED > #endif > > + #ifndef _TIME_T_DECLARED > + typedef __time_t time_t; > + #define _TIME_T_DECLARED > + #endif > + > #ifndef _PID_T_DECLARED > typedef __pid_t pid_t; > #define _PID_T_DECLARED > > (it looks like pid_t should be before size_t in sem.h btw) Good. (I didn't check if there are any other missing typedefs.) Please commit. The old typedefs also have non-KNF whitespace. sys/ipc.h is better. BruceReceived on Mon Oct 16 2006 - 23:39:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:01 UTC