Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > Hi > > I have notice that it is no more possible to find what process is eats > all CPU time with top, vmstat and tools like that. This happens with > current some (big) time ago. > > See here vmstat (vm mode) output: > > 3.3%Sys 0.8%Intr 95.9%User 0.0%Nice 0.0%Idle %ozfod 128 > rtc irq8 > | | | | | | | | | | | daefr 66 > cbb0 pcm0+ > ==>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prcfr 1 > ata0 irq14 > 33 dtbuf 47 totfr > ata1 irq15 > Namei Name-cache Dir-cache 69694 desvn react > Calls hits % hits % 15144 numvn pdwak > 1259 1259 100 9063 frevn pdpgs > intrn > > 99.5% CPU used in user space. > > now top output (sorted by CPU): > last pid: 2024; load averages: 1.03, 0.65, 0.40 up 0+01:28:34 > 11:38:50 > 120 processes: 4 running, 116 sleeping > CPU states: 95.7% user, 0.0% nice, 3.5% system, 0.8% interrupt, 0.0% > idle > Mem: 589M Active, 209M Inact, 146M Wired, 512K Cache, 111M Buf, 46M Free > Swap: 1200M Total, 1200M Free > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU > COMMAND > 927 root 1 97 0 52084K 28172K select 1:02 2.98% Xorg > 1128 vova 1 96 0 21172K 13676K select 0:10 0.98% > metacity > 1252 vova 1 96 0 38024K 29884K select 1:56 0.63% > skype_bin > 1386 vova 11 126 0 516M 470M RUN 3:42 0.00% > evolution-2.6 > 1134 vova 3 20 0 21540K 13496K kserel 1:38 0.00% > gkrellm > 1113 vova 1 96 0 19592K 9604K select 0:17 0.00% > at-spi-registryd > 1327 vova 1 96 0 34464K 24668K select 0:10 0.00% sim > 1323 vova 1 96 0 24552K 17212K select 0:09 0.00% > cpufreq-applet > ... > > > No any idea who eats these 95.5% of CPU time. > Same picture on vmstat's pigs screen. > > I know that this process is actually evolution, and if I kill it system > load drops, but why it is not shown by top (and other). As I understand it if the application is working in a thread then the cpu statistics are not available. So a threaded program can often be using 100% cpu and show up as barely any in top. Then you have to try and guess which one of the processes it likely is. I get this a lot on my desktop and it is very annoying. As far as I know it cannot be easily fixed. > Any hints about it ? > Thanks, DominicReceived on Tue Sep 05 2006 - 06:26:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:00 UTC