Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:20:33PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:01:29PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 03:56:54PM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote: >>>> Daichi GOTO wrote: >>>>> Patchset-16: >>>>> For 7-current >>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p16.diff >>>>> >>>>> For 6.x >>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p16.diff >>>> I'm sorry, how silly of me. I updated miss edited things. >>>> I updated correct things now. Please check it :) >>> Dear Goto-san, >>> >>> The panic I was previously seeing (with chrooting into the unionfs) >>> appears to be fixed, but after a bit of load I got the following >>> locking assertion on a unionfs (default mount options) stacked over a >>> nullfs mount of a local ufs filesystem: >> I got the same panic from a mount_unionfs -b mount with no nullfs >> involved. > > Another panic from mount_unionfs -b when just running 'vi' on a file. > By the way, I recommend you run with DEBUG_LOCKS and DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS > if you're not already doing so, because it looks like there are still > a number of locking problems. Oops ;-X Yeah, we have a new patchset to solve above problem I think. -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichiReceived on Tue Sep 05 2006 - 12:35:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:00 UTC