Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

From: Andre Oppermann <andre_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:31:34 +0200
Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann <andre_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
>> > Your patch looks good and is the way to go.
>> >
>> > So after Jack confirms that your patch works with the em driver
>> > would you commit to to -current?
>>
>> Absolutely.  :-)
>>
>> > The driver related changes can follow..
>> >
>> > Later we also need to fix ifconfig so that user can enable/disable 
>> TSO on the interface.
>>
>> I'll do that together with the TSO code.
> 
> OK, I've built and done some touch testing of this. I like it, the 
> driver has
> some counters of the number of TSO bursts it does, and I think I see more
> per netperf test with your patch than mine.
> 
> Hard to do real performance testing with all that WITNESS stuff in, but
> I will be making a 6.1 version of your patch to test with since I have my
> driver running on that anyway.

You can disable WITNESS and INVARIANTS pretty easily in -current and
get the full performance with it.

> If you do the ifconfig changes there will need to be a small amount of
> code added to em_ioctl() but it should be trivial.
> 
> You want me to reissue a driver patch with changes for your code?

Yes, please do so.  I've got a dual-em card which I can test with myself.

-- 
Andre
Received on Tue Sep 05 2006 - 19:31:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:00 UTC