Re: Quick poll (openoffice port)

On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:22:18AM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:51:12AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > Just a quick poll to fisd out if it's just me or something else.
> > 
> > Has anyone managed to compile any of openoffice.org-1.0,
> > openoffice.org-1.1 or openoffice.org-2.0 on a recent(ish) CURRENT?
> 
> Actually, I've had a problem with openoffice-2.0's java configuration,
> which I'm happy to take to whoever I need to.
> 
> The problem is that the /usr/local/jdk1.4.1 path is hard-coded a couple
> places, but the java/jdk14 port is up to 1.4.2.   Paractically, this
> means when I make the OO port, the first thing it tries to do is install
> java/jdk14 which fails because java/jdk14 is already installed.
> Symlinking /usr/local/jdk1.4.1 to /usr/local/jdk1.4.2 fails further down
> the compilation (the error indicates that one of the later OO
> configuration steps - not the a ports step - is unhappy about the
> symbolic link).
> 
> You should be able to reporduce this by just installing jdk1.4.2 and not
> jdk1.4.1 and typing make in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0 .

This dependency seems fixed in 2.0.4.m2 .  Thanks!

-- 
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG