On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:02:40PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Any news on this? I basically look at locale stuff, they sypport multibyte which is good. Someone must test its compatibility with GNU regex and understand in details nature of their changes/fixes/differences. Without this work we can't blindly replace stable code with unknown one just for reason it is actively maintained. > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:04:24PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > > A recent discussion on the gm4 and gnulib mailing lists over the merits > > > of gm4's bundling of its own regex implementation has produced the > > > suggestion, that we replace our src/gnu/lib/libregex (which is currently > > > obtained from fedora-glibc-2_3_4-21) with gnulib's implementation. > > > > > > The latter is claimed to be more actively maintained and with more bug > > > fixes, than glibc people have managed to incorporate. > > > > > > Does anyone have a strong preference for fedora/glibc implementation > > > currently in use, or should we follow this advice (source -- regex' > > > maintainer for gnulib -- CC-ed) and switch over? > > > > Please point to gnulib's regex sources to compare with. -- http://ache.pp.ru/Received on Tue Sep 26 2006 - 16:45:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:00 UTC