Re: Much improved sosend_*() functions

From: Mike Silbersack <silby_at_silby.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:15:58 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Randall Stewart wrote:

> Hmm.. I would think 512b and 1K will not show any
> improvement.. since they would probably end up either
> in an mbuf chain.. or a single 2k (or maybe 4k) cluster..

I know, I just want to make sure that it doesn't somehow cause performance
loss for those cases!

> In fact I have always thought we should:
>
> a) have no data portion in an mbuf.. just pointers i.e. always
>     an EXT
>
> b) Have a 256/512 and 1k cluster too..

Implement and benchmark it. :)

Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Received on Fri Sep 29 2006 - 19:16:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:00 UTC