On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, John Baldwin wrote: >>>> Btw, this is a topic that is easily searched on, as it gets brought up >>>> fairly regularly. We were a bit late on the schedule this time, though, >>>> so thanks for giving it a kickstart. >>> >>> We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past. > Only >>> cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level. I'd still say leave nfs and > ufs >>> alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra > isofs >>> directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point. >>> >> >> What about moving all of the net* directories into /sys/net?. And don't >> forget putting i386 and friends into /sys/arch! Ah, I love the smell of >> fresh paint in the morning. Smells like.... napalm. > > Baby steps aren't hard. :) Back when I first made rumblings about this sort > of thing we didn't have a sys/fs at all, but now we do and over time we've > actually moved most of our filesystems into it. :) The great thing about moving all the network subtrees around is how we can break the compile of all the existing applications that include net/*, netinet/*, netinet6/*, etc, all in one pass. :-) Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of CambridgeReceived on Fri Sep 29 2006 - 20:55:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:00 UTC