* Howard Su <howard0su_at_gmail.com> [070404 01:20] wrote: > Following the suggestion in idea page, I proposed the attached patch. > I didn't change any kernel part because I think PTRACE(2) is > functional although man page didn't document it. > > I tested the patch under i386 and amd64 box. The help on testing and > code review will be appreciated. wow, well done! any draw backs to using ptrace over procfs? have you tested performance? -AlfredReceived on Wed Apr 04 2007 - 08:31:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:07 UTC