On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 19:43:05 +0200 Roman Divacky <rdivacky_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > --- linprocfs.c 30 Mar 2007 17:56:44 -0000 1.108 > > +++ linprocfs.c 6 Apr 2007 17:33:05 -0000 > > _at__at_ -1238,3 +1238,5 _at__at_ > > PSEUDOFS(linprocfs, 1); > > MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, linux, 1, 1, 1); > > MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, procfs, 1, 1, 1); > > +MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, sysvmsg, 1, 1, 1); > > +MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, sysvsem, 1, 1, 1); > I dont like this, I would prefer some dynamic determining > whether sysv symbols are present and if not just fill > in "safe" values. > is there a way to do this nicely? safe values? Ah, that's solution is not good. When linprocfs is loaded, if sysvmsg or sysvsem module is not(or not loaded), these modules should be loaded. And you know well thus modules like snd_*.Received on Fri Apr 06 2007 - 16:08:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:07 UTC