On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:51:20 -0400 Jung-uk Kim <jkim_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > --- linprocfs.c 30 Mar 2007 17:56:44 -0000 1.108 > > +++ linprocfs.c 6 Apr 2007 17:33:05 -0000 > > _at__at_ -1238,3 +1238,5 _at__at_ > > PSEUDOFS(linprocfs, 1); > > MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, linux, 1, 1, 1); > > MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, procfs, 1, 1, 1); > > +MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, sysvmsg, 1, 1, 1); > > +MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, sysvsem, 1, 1, 1); > Looks good. I will commit it shortly. > BTW, 'linux' module depends on these modules. Is loading 'dependency > of dependency' broken? Should we have to explicitly tell it to load > the dependencies? Am I missing something here? :-( 'dependency of dependency' you saied is not broken. It's specification:-) of kernel symbol resolver. It can resolve one level export symbols:-(.Received on Fri Apr 06 2007 - 16:26:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:07 UTC