Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" <almarrie_at_gmail.com> writes: >> May I ask you why do you prefer portsnap over them? > > It's simpler to use, and a lot faster. It's also HTTP-based, which > makes it firewall-friendly, even in braindead corporate environments. > > DES Plus the saving in bandwidth for a large number of machines (I know bandwidth is cheap but still,) if you use a caching proxy. Oh and its cryptographically signed if thats a concern :) VinceReceived on Thu Apr 12 2007 - 07:57:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:08 UTC