Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 05:20:44PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:18:43PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:35:25AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: >>>> It appears that someone has broken gdb in -current. >>>> >>>> laptop:kargl[250] cat > hello.c >>>> #include <stdio.h> >>>> int main(void) { >>>> printf("Hello world!\n"); >>>> return 0; >>>> } >>>> laptop:kargl[251] cc -o z -g hello.c >>>> laptop:kargl[252] ./z >>>> Hello world! >>>> laptop:kargl[253] gdb z >>>> (gdb) run >>>> Starting program: /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z >>>> Terminated >>>> >>>> gdb appears to spwan the csh comamnd below and then just spins. >>>> >>> Reverting to a March 01, 2007 -current gives >>> >>> (gdb) run >>> Starting program: /usr/home/kargl/tmp/z >>> Hello world! >>> >>> Program exited normally. >>> >>> the expected result. A binary search for the guilty commit >>> is going to be a PITA on my old laptop. >> A March 31, 2007 -current exibits a broken gdb. Up next >> March 15, 2007. >> > > I've narrowed the problem down to the 22-26 Mar 07 range. > there was a new version of csh in that period.. (or close to it...)Received on Sat Apr 14 2007 - 03:22:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:08 UTC