Re: CFT: new trunk(4)

On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:37:38 -0700
"Kip Macy" <kip.macy_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Am I correct in assuming that all the people who feel strongly that
> the current name should be kept to avoid a query-replace in the
> documentation are volunteering to clarify on Andrew's behalf any
> future name related confusion ?

Both way!? :)

My feel wasn't a strong one, i just feel it more natural to keep the
name of the original one as i don't see any name clashing or confusion
with trunk, but maybe that's just me.

Regards
-- 
Massimo.run();
...his disciples lead him in; he just does the rest. -- Tommy