Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt_at_mac.com> writes: > On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:09 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > Marcel, my words may have been poorly chosen, but I've been using GPT > > for several years, and I've reported these issues (and others) to you > > several times over the course of those years and witnessed your > > complete lack of interest. > Yes, your words were poorly chosen and you continue to show poor > judgement. I have exactly 1 thread in my mailbox where I discuss > GPT with you and that problem has been resolved. Yes, it was eventually resolved. You ignored my initial report. I bugged you about it, and we had a fairly fruitful conversation during which I pinpointed the exact change which had broken GPT. That was five months - to the day - before the bug, an overly-restrictive sanity check which prevented GEOM_GPT from recognizing its own GPTs, was finally fixed. > I fail to see how that's several times over the course of years > and I fail to see how that represents a complete lack of interest. > > What else did you send me mail about? The fact that it's not possible to view or modify the partition table while partitions are mounted. > In an attempt to close the gap between us, let me ask you this: > What's the cleft between g_part and the other GEOM classes? > In what way do you think I'm hell-bent to increase that what > I don't know? I should have said "the gap between $GPT and other GEOM classes", where $GPT is "whichever GEOM class currently implements GPT support". We have a fairly large number of GEOM classes, and right now they fall into two categories: 1) those that are configured using a geom(8) plugin: gcache, gconcat, geli, gjournal, glabel, gmirror, gmultipath, gnop, graid3, gshsec, gstripe 2) those that aren't: $GPT, gbde and gvinum (there's a third category - GEOM classes which replace legacy code and interface with legacy applications such as fdisk(8) and bsdlabel(8) - but it isn't relevant here) The fact that GEOM_GPT was in the second category was understandable given that it was written two years before geom(8), but now that we *do* have geom(8) I believe it is in everyone's interest to use it. Yes, *your* interests as well, because it really *is* that easy to write a geom(8) plugin if your class implements the necessary verbs; you'll spend less time on the code than on the man page. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.noReceived on Mon Apr 23 2007 - 16:32:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:09 UTC