Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)

Hi, Daniel,

Xin LI wrote:
> Daniel Eischen wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> [...]
>> It looks like the less import broke this behavior (inhibiting ti/te
>> when invoked as more).  See the changes between r1.7 and r1.8 of
>> contrib/less/screen.c.
> [...]
>> This seems to fix it:
>>
>> Index: main.c
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /opt/FreeBSD/cvs/src/contrib/less/main.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.9
>> diff -u -r1.9 main.c
>> --- main.c      23 Jun 2007 15:28:00 -0000      1.9
>> +++ main.c      30 Jul 2007 02:58:39 -0000
>> _at__at_ -165,7 +165,7 _at__at_
>>                 quit(QUIT_OK);
>>         }
>>
>> -       if (less_is_more && get_quit_at_eof())
>> +       if (less_is_more || get_quit_at_eof())
>>                 no_init = quit_if_one_screen = TRUE;
> 
> This sounds reasonable to me, actually more(1) implies quit_at_eof.
> 
> To re_at_, may I commit this change against -HEAD?

Please commit this change if re_at_ approves it in the upcoming two or 
three days.  This is definitely an annoying bug and I'm afraid that I 
have to leave my workstation for a short while :-)

Cheers,