On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: > From stress2's random syscall test: > > db> wh > Tracing pid 45777 tid 100465 td 0xc61b7000 > kdb_enter(c077f50d,2,c0782352,ed0fab84,2,...) at kdb_enter+0x33 > panic(c0782352,c0788b88,c5e1107c,20000,0,...) at panic+0xed > lock_init(c5e1107c,c07c67c4,c0788b88,0,20000) at lock_init+0x8c > mtx_init(c5e1107c,c0788b88,0,0,79400d31,...) at mtx_init+0x9f > aio_init_aioinfo(c61c4ab0,c057d463,c07e6520,9579c960,31a964,...) at aio_init_aioinfo+0x4b > aio_aqueue(c61b7000,79400d31,0,2,1,...) at aio_aqueue+0x8d > oaio_read(c61b7000,ed0facf8,4,c078503a,c07c2250,...) at oaio_read+0x32 > syscall(ed0fad38) at syscall+0x14f > Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x20 > --- syscall (318, FreeBSD ELF32, oaio_read), eip = 0x280c0969, esp = 0xbfbfe5f0, ebp = 0xbfbfe638 --- > db> x/s 0xc0782352 > 0xc0782352: lock "%s" %p already initialized Could this be a similar issue? I noticed it with 7.0-CURRENT-200706. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=114216 -- Kirk Russell <kirk_at_ba23.org> http://www.ba23.org/Received on Wed Aug 08 2007 - 18:25:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:16 UTC