On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 02:03:28PM +0900, Nathan Butcher wrote: > >I tried to roll back to right before the above mentioned change > >Karsten (well, I assume it was him :-) ) noted on IRC that it might > >be the cause of the problems since I have a similar controller, though > >not exactly the same one, but it didn't fix the timeouts for me. > > >For this server I have 3 disks in a graid3 (so no ZFS but the errors > >are similar to what I have seen / heard about wrt. ZFS + ata use) and > >I get timeouts several times a day which causes FreeBSD to loose > >contact with one or more disks where I have to reboot before things > >recover (usually FreeBSD panic's enough so the system reboots by > >itself). > > I'm certain that the issue with this card isn't limited to ZFS. It's > been seen before in the 6.x series too. > > I really would like to find out which code changes ruined the card's > correct operation... if that could help the ata maintainer in some way. > Unfortunately my csup-fu isn't that strong, otherwise I would send my > source tree back to June 15th and analyse daily buildworlds from that > date until I could pin-point the exact date and file changes that caused > the problem all of us are seeing. > > Could someone teach me how to do csup rollbacks to a specific date in > the source tree? If it's not obvious already, I'd really like to squash > this bug. Nathan, This problem has gone away for me, for the most part. At one point, out of desparation, I changed a few lines in the kernel to prevent crashes. I don't have this problem with zfs, but that is on a production server using a SCSI RAID system. (v6.2-stable about a year old) According to csup(1) just add 'date=[cc]yy.mm.dd.hh.mm.ss' to your cmdline arguments. Presumably it also works in 'supfile'. Note that you must supply the full year past 2000. I'd either reserve another space or back-up your current source tree. I've only needed to backtrack once before and that was using cvsup(1). Corrupted or improperly tagged material just stays. Actually this is a feature, but offtopic. The machine I'm referring too uses an on-board nVidia N570 SATA-300 system, though the Promise cards are 100% compatible. (and preferred because the connectors are hard to reach and as a result are easy to break) BillReceived on Mon Aug 13 2007 - 05:15:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:16 UTC