> > Yes, exactly, there needs to be a smarter test that can distingiush if > IPSEC is actually in use on a connection or not; I should have been > more clear about this. The problem is that I have zero knowledge > about IPSEC, so I have no idea how to do this. > > I'm worried that people will compile IPSEC into the kernel to run an > encrypted tunnel (or the TCP MD5 signature stuff for BGP), and > then be rather surprised that their their "normal" TCP performance > stinks. Maybe file it as a PR? -KipReceived on Thu Aug 16 2007 - 18:10:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:16 UTC