Re: Does 7-CURRENT (aka cvsup tag=.) build under 6-STABLE?

From: Randy Bush <randy_at_psg.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:24:16 -1000

i just upgraded two RELENG_6 boxes to 7-CURRENT last eve.  no prob.
i was silly and broke the union rules by following the instructions
at the bottom of /usr/src/UPDATING.  it is extremely rare that i
have had problems on this path, 4 to 5, 5 to 6, 6 to 7.  have not
tried 7 to 8 yet.

randy

Received on Sat Aug 18 2007 - 13:24:25 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bruce A. Mah: "Re: ZFS: Listable but un-stat():able snapshot"
Previous message: Daniel O'Connor: "Re: firewire problem (root node is not cycle master capable)"
Maybe in reply to: Andrew Reilly: "Does 7-CURRENT (aka cvsup tag=.) build under 6-STABLE?"
Next in thread: Andrew Reilly: "Re: Does 7-CURRENT (aka cvsup tag=.) build under 6-STABLE?"
Reply: Andrew Reilly: "Re: Does 7-CURRENT (aka cvsup tag=.) build under 6-STABLE?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:16 UTC