Re: Does 7-CURRENT (aka cvsup tag=.) build under 6-STABLE?

From: <illoai_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:49:00 -0500
On 19/08/07, Andrew Reilly <andrew-freebsd_at_areilly.bpc-users.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 05:24:16AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> > i just upgraded two RELENG_6 boxes to 7-CURRENT last eve.  no prob.
> > i was silly and broke the union rules by following the instructions
> > at the bottom of /usr/src/UPDATING.  it is extremely rare that i
> > have had problems on this path, 4 to 5, 5 to 6, 6 to 7.  have not
> > tried 7 to 8 yet.
>
> Thanks for the "it works" reports, folks.  Re-supped and
> currently re-building, and it seems to be going OK now.  Yes,
> I've upgraded in-place on most previous occasions, too.  (Only
> exception was to 6, from memory, because a dump/wipe/install/restore
> seemed to be the easiest way to get UFS2 onto the disks...)
>
> Oh: there's an 8?  I didn't think that 7 had been
> tagged/branched, yet.

If the "." tag gives you 7, I seriously doubt there's
an 8, although you might get into some double
secret order of banana scouts if you can figure
out the right tag.

Call me from the Bildeberg, if you [cflmrt]ake it.

-- 
--
Received on Mon Aug 20 2007 - 15:49:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:16 UTC