Re: -current cross compile for -stable

From: Danny Braniss <danny_at_cs.huji.ac.il>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:00:41 +0300
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:19:42PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> > > On 8/28/07, LI Xin <delphij_at_delphij.net> wrote:
> > > > Danny Braniss wrote:
> > > > > till now I used a stable box to cross compile for other
> > > > > arch/stable|current.  today i decided to try out -current as  a
> > > > > base to cross compile. does it work? since i get:
> > > > >
> > > > > export MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/r+d/obj/cs4
> > > > > cd /r+d/6.2/src; make  TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld
> > > > > ...
> > > > This won't work.  In order to build -STABLE you have to install a
> > > > chrooted RELENG_6 environment and chroot into it to make it work.
> > > 
> > > I think there is a hack for ports' tinderbox, patch is at
> > > http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/binutils.diff
> > > Not sure it appears in ports_at_ mailing or tinderbox's.
> > 
> > well, I can confirm that it works. 1)I'm now testing the result
> > by  using the result to make buildworld - goto 1 :-).
> > 
> > so, if it works for tinderbox, and for me, can it be 'installed'?
> 
> There's no reason to - if you want to build RELENG_6 on a 7.x box, you
> should have RELENG_6 chroot to do so.  You'll just keep running into
> problems as we don't support builds the way you're trying.

one of the things that attracted me to FreeBSD was the fact that I could 
cross-compile. I always, till now, used a RELENG as a base (solid? :-) to
build CURRENT, but now, so close to releases, I decided to try the other way,
just before upgrading.

So now I have some questions:
	- Is documented != supported?
	- is building on a RELENG for CURRRENT ok?
danny
Received on Wed Aug 29 2007 - 04:00:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:16 UTC